A phone call from Mark Cuban convinced Elon Musk to make a deal with the SEC

news image

As Tesla’s embattled CEO, Elon Musk, was digging his heels in and reportedly threatening to quit his job rather than make a deal with the Securities and Exchange Commission, his lawyer got a brilliant idea: bring Mark Cuban in for the rescue.

Musk had hired Cuban’s lawyer to help him fend off a lawsuit from the SEC alleging that Musk’s infamous “funding secured” tweet violated its regulations. The agency was seeking to not only fine Musk, but bar him from holding office in a public company.

[Come hear Mark Cuban speak at Business Insider’s IGNITION conference, December 3 and 4.]

The lawyer, Chris Clark, represented Cuban during his yearslong fight with the SEC, which sued him in 2008 on charges of insider trading. Cuban eventually won that dispute in 2013, but it wasn’t easy, and he lost various battles along the way. Cuban has since routinely lambasted the SEC and jumped into others’ fights with it by filing amicus briefs.

Mark Cuban.
Slaven Vlasic/Getty Images

In a phone call to Musk last Thursday, Cuban recounted the kinds of tactics the SEC used against him, The Wall Street Journal reported.

Cuban said in an email to The Journal that he told Musk that if Musk didn’t negotiate a settlement, it would cause a long and ugly battle that would distract him from running his companies.

And that sounds like the kind of warning that could change Musk’s mind.

Musk is laser-focused on his companies, particularly as Tesla attempts to increase production of its much-in-demand electric cars. As Business Insider previously reported, Musk has his fingers into every detail of Tesla and works so many hours at its facilities that employees have consistently found him asleep under tables and in conference rooms.

The call was apparently a turning point in a wrenching 48 hours for Tesla in which its board agreed to a settlement and Musk threatened to quit over it but was then persuaded to agree.

The settlement included $40 million in fines, $20 million to be paid by Tesla and the rest by Musk. It also required him to step down as chairman for at least three years.

Cuban and Tesla did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Read More

from Viral Eyes https://ift.tt/2zTh8Rq
via IFTTT

See photos from Freeform’s spooktacular Hocus Pocus and Nightmare Before Christmas-themed Halloween House

news image

Get ready to run amok amok amok amok amok amok! In celebration of its 31 Nights of Halloween, Freeform is inviting fans to its Halloween House, an immersive experience inspired by Hocus Pocus and The Nightmare Before Christmas, both of which turn 25 in 2018. The network made over Hollywood’s historic Lombardi House to create the ghostly, ghoulish destination, which includes vivid recreations of Dr. Finkelstein’s laboratory, the Sanderson Sisters’ cottage (complete with Winifred’s spell book and a rather judgmental interactive black flame candle), and Jack Skellington’s spiral hill, among other iconic scenes, items, and locations from both beloved films. The free tickets to the haunted pop-up are now sold out, but check out all the creepy details ahead — they’ll put a spell on you.  

1 of 15
Matt Petit/Freeform

This is Halloween

Get ready to run amok amok amok amok amok amok! In celebration of its 31 Nights of Halloween, Freeform is inviting fans to its Halloween House, an immersive experience inspired by Hocus Pocus and The Nightmare Before Christmas, both of which turn 25 in 2018. The network made over Hollywood’s historic Lombardi House to create the ghostly, ghoulish destination, which includes vivid recreations of Dr. Finkelstein’s laboratory, the Sanderson Sisters’ cottage (complete with Winifred’s spell book and a rather judgmental interactive black flame candle), and Jack Skellington’s spiral hill, among other iconic scenes, items, and locations from both beloved films. The free tickets to the haunted pop-up are now sold out, but check out all the creepy details ahead — they’ll put a spell on you.  

Advertisement

2 of 15
Matt Petit/Freeform

Which way?

3 of 15
Matt Petit/Freeform

Climb Spiral Hill, sing an existential lament

Advertisement

4 of 15
Matt Petit/Freeform

Hudson Yang, Ian Chen & Co. plot to kidnap the Sandy Claws

Advertisement

5 of 15
Matt Petit/Freeform

R.I.P.

Advertisement

6 of 15
Matt Petit/Freeform

Harry Shum Jr. volunteers for an experiment

Advertisement

7 of 15
Matt Petit/Freeform

Build-a-Reindeer Workshop

Advertisement

8 of 15
Matt Petit/Freeform

He’s a gamblin’ boogie man, though he doesn’t play fair

Advertisement

9 of 15
Matt Petit/Freeform

Snake eyes!

Advertisement

10 of 15
Matt Petit/Freeform

Snap a pic of yourself as a Sanderson statue

Advertisement

11 of 15
Matt Petit/Freeform

Aubrey Anderson-Emmons opts for a broom rather than a vacuum

Advertisement

12 of 15
Matt Petit/Freeform

Dare you light the black flame candle?

Advertisement

13 of 15
Matt Petit/Freeform

Chandra Wilson brews a Sanderson recipe

Advertisement

14 of 15
Matt Petit/Freeform

Katherine McNamara and Luke Baines hang out 

Advertisement

Freeform’s 31 Nights of Halloween is happening now. Check out the full schedule to catch your spooky favorites. 

15 of 15
Matt Petit/Freeform

Boo!

Freeform’s 31 Nights of Halloween is happening now. Check out the full schedule to catch your spooky favorites. 

Read More

from Viral Eyes https://ift.tt/2QAh7r5
via IFTTT

The EU-Sisi deal shows Egyptian lives don’t matter

news image

Eight years ago, a photo of the brutalised body of Khaled Said, a young man from the Egyptian port city of Alexandria, went viral on social media. Said had been beaten to death by local police, who alleged that he had died from asphyxiation after stuffing a bag of hashish down his own throat.

Public anger over repression, police brutality and impunity under the regime of President Hosni Mubarak had been simmering for years and with Said’s murder, it boiled over. Unprecedented protests took place in Alexandria and Cairo that summer under the slogan “We are all Khaled Said”.

Six months later, in January 2011, Said would become one of the symbols of the Egyptian uprising, as people took to the streets, calling for freedom and dignity and the downfall of the regime. After Mubarak was toppled, graffiti artists painted Said’s face on buildings in downtown Cairo.

Today, the graffiti is gone, whitewashed by the regime of Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, who has unleashed an unprecedented level of violence and repression onto the people of Egypt which many see as “worse than Mubarak’s“.

Report after report by human rights organisations have detailed massacres, mass arrests, torture in detention, forced disappearances and death sentences in Egypt, calling on the rest of the world to take action.

The European Union, however, has chosen to ignore these pleas and continue cooperation with the Sisi regime. Not even the forced disappearance, torture and brutal murder of one of its citizens in 2016, Italian student Giulio Regeni, changed this stance; his mother, Paola Regeni, famously said: “They killed him like an Egyptian.”

After an initial rebuke of the Egyptian authorities, who are seen as being responsible for the murder, Italy quietly returned its ambassador to Cairo last year and proceeded to conclude an energy deal with Egypt.

Today, the racist far-right Italian government is at the forefront of EU efforts to strike deals with North African countries to prevent desperate people fleeing violence, abject poverty and war from reaching European shores. One of these states is el-Sisi’s Egypt.

In mid-September, it emerged that the EU is negotiating a deal with the Egyptian dictator to have his security forces up their policing of coastal waters and divert vessels carrying refugees to Egypt. In return, the Egyptian regime will receive financial support and investment and high-profile visits from European leaders.

If such a deal is concluded, this would be a bright and shiny proof that for the EU, Egyptian lives don’t matter.

An Egyptian boy passes by a mural of Khaled Said’s post-mortem photo in downtown Cairo on November 29, 2012 [Reuters/Amr Abdallah Dalsh]

El-Sisi’s horrendous track-record

Since el-Sisi took over in a bloody coup in the summer of 2013, his human rights record has gone from bad to worse. Tens of thousands have been imprisoned under various repressive laws – from activists and journalists to ordinary people.

Human Rights Watch has declared that there is a “torture epidemic” in Egypt which may constitute a crime against humanity. Amnesty International has documented the forcible disappearance of hundreds of Egyptians. The world has baulked at the number of court cases in which death sentences have been handed down to dozens of civilians.

And beyond the everyday repression Egypt’s general population is facing, el-Sisi’s regime has not spared refugees either. Since 2013, human rights defenders have called on the Egyptian authorities to stop arbitrarily arresting and deporting Syrian and Palestinian refugees. Syrians deported to Damascus have been at a high risk of facing detention and torture by the Syrian regime.

The Egyptian police have also been detaining and harassing refugees and asylum seekers from Sudan and the Horn of Africa, with NGOs reporting that hundreds were detained for seeking to leave Egypt “illegally”. In 2015, Egyptian border police shot and killed 15 Sudanese migrants and wounded another eight at the Egyptian-Israeli border.

If Egypt starts diverting intercepted boats to its shores and intensifies its crackdown on refugees and migrants who make it through its borders, its fundamentally flawed judiciary and appallingly tough conditions in Egypt’s immensely overcrowded prisons strongly suggest that this will result in an abundance of human rights abuses.

Given its overloaded healthcare system and inadequate social provision, it is also highly doubtful that it would be able to provide for the basic needs of these people. Severe restrictions placed on the operations of over 47,000 NGOs through a draconian bill also mean that the non-profit sector will not be able to help either.

The personal belongings of murdered Italian student Giulio Regeni that the Egyptian interior ministry alleged were found when it killed members of a criminal gang suspected of links to his killing; the Italian government rejected the claim [AP]

El-Sisi’s paid-for legitimacy, EU betrayal

It is in the context of these past and future human rights abuses that the EU’s decision to work with el-Sisi must be strongly condemned. Any deal struck with the Egyptian president will diminish the diplomatic legitimacy and moral authority of the EU in Egypt and beyond.

Any arrangement whatsoever with el-Sisi will justify Italian Interior Minister Matteo Salvini’s blatantly racist, violent and hostile policies towards migrants and the much-maligned NGOs trying to help them.

This intended partnership is the unfortunate and painful betrayal of liberal democracy and every individual unfairly imprisoned, tortured, forcibly disappeared and killed by Egyptian security forces since 2013.

And all the wonderfully crafted EU statements lambasting the undemocratic actions of authoritarian governments in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Gabon, Equatorial Guinea and Cameroon will ring shamefully hollow once questioned through the dark, blood-filled prism of regressive diplomatic solidarity with el-Sisi.

No doubt the Egyptian president will use his administration’s partnership with the EU as diplomatic cover for further brutal clampdowns on human rights campaigners, NGOs and political rivals, all to bolster his wafer-thin legitimacy. No doubt el-Sisi’s propaganda machinery will go into overdrive publicising his EU engagements as solid proof of his supposedly strong, progressive and indispensable leadership on the world stage.

No doubt ordinary Egyptians and desperate migrants from the Middle East, sub-Saharan Africa and the Sahel region will come to understand and experience first-hand how the EU has no genuine desire to help foster stability, security and prosperity, democracy, fundamental freedoms and the rule of law in Egypt.

And no doubt, after all is said and done, many will soon come to realise the hard way that the EU does not promote and practise the gospel of democracy it preaches and cares little if at all about Arab and African lives. 

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera’s editorial stance. 

Read More

from Viral Eyes https://ift.tt/2zS08ux
via IFTTT

Brett Kavanaugh, on eve of vote, says he regrets ‘sharp,’ ’emotional’ tone during hearing

news image

CLOSE

Republican leaders are showing increasing confidence in the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. (Oct. 4)
AP

WASHINGTON – Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh says he was “sharp” and said “a few things I should not have” during a Senate hearing over sexual assault allegations last week. 

Kavanaugh, writing in an opinion piece for the Wall Street Journal, said he regretted his tone at times during last week’s Senate Judiciary Committee hearing that included Christine Blasey Ford, who has accused Kavanaugh of sexually assaulted her when they were both teens.

“I was very emotional last Thursday, more so than I have ever been,” Kavanaugh wrote. “I might have been too emotional at times. I know that my tone was sharp, and I said a few things I should not have said.”

More: Brett Kavanaugh: Procedural vote set for Friday morning as senators weigh FBI report

More: Brett Kavanaugh and the FBI report on allegations against him: Here’s what we know now

More: ‘We are your voters!’ Energized Kavanaugh protesters put swing vote lawmakers on notice

Kavanaugh promised in the piece, titled “I am an independent, impartial judge,” that his tone was not an indication that his open-mindedness would change if the Senate confirms him to the nation’s highest court. 

“Going forward, you can count on me to be the same kind of judge and person I have been for my entire 28-year legal career: hardworking, even-keeled, open-minded, independent and dedicated to the Constitution and the public good,” he wrote. 

The editorial was published on the eve of a pivotal vote in his confirmation. A procedural vote on Kavanaugh’s nomination is scheduled for 10:30 a.m. EDT Friday. If it passes, it could pave the way for a final vote as early as Saturday. 

Republican leaders are increasingly optimistic about Kavanaugh’s chances of confirmation after two undecided Republican senators, Jeff Flake and Susan Collins, gave initial positive reactions to an FBI report looking into the sexual assault allegations.

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

Read or Share this story: https://ift.tt/2P7iltb

Read More

from Viral Eyes https://ift.tt/2QvaQfZ
via IFTTT

Ben Affleck on his third rehab stint: ‘I am fighting for … my family’

news image

CLOSE

Bruce Wayne (Ben Affleck) visits Barry Allen (Ezra Miller) during his superhero recruitment drive in ‘Justice League.’
Warner Bros.

Ben Affleck is speaking out for the first time since his recent stint in rehab. 

In a message posted to Instagram Thursday, the “Justice League” actor, 46, confirmed he completed a “forty day stay at a treatment for alcohol addiction.” He revealed his journey is long from over and he will continue outpatient care.

“Battling any addiction is a lifelong and difficult struggle,” he wrote. “Because of that, one is never really in or out of treatment. It is full-time commitment.”

Related: Reports: Ben Affleck driven to rehab by estranged wife Jennifer Garner

Affleck thanked his family for sticking by his side and noted they are his motivation to keep “fighting.”

“The support I have received from my family, colleagues and fans means more to me than I can say. It’s given me the strength and support to speak about my illness with others,” Affleck said. 

He added that the outpouring of sympathy from those facing similar battles helped the actor realize, “I am not alone.”

“So many people have reached out on social media and spoken about their own journeys with addiction,” he wrote. “To those people, I want to say thank you. Your strength is inspiring and is supporting me in ways I didn’t think was possible.”

One day, Affleck said, he hopes to be an example “to others that are struggling.”

People magazine and Entertainment Tonight first reported Affleck’s estranged wife, actress Jennifer Garner, drove the actor to a rehab facility in late August.

The father of three has struggled with alcohol addiction in the past.

Affleck entered rehab in 2001 for alcohol, a couple months after the debut of his film “Pearl Harbor.” 

In March 2017, he shared on his Facebook page that he’d “completed treatment for alcohol addiction,” explaining it was “something I’ve dealt with in the past and will continue to confront.”

“I want to live life to the fullest and be the best father I can be,” Affleck wrote before acknowledging Garner. “I’m lucky to have the love of my family and friends, including my co-parent, Jen, who has supported me and cared for our kids as I’ve done the work I set out to do. This was the first of many steps being taken towards a positive recovery.”

Affleck and Garner announced their plans to divorce in 2015 after 10 years of marriage. They have three children together: Violet, 12, Seraphina, 9, and Samuel, 6.

Just days ago, Garner filed paperwork to have their divorce case sent to a private judge to accelerate the process, according to court documents obtained by US Weekly. E! News confirms a judge signed off on her request Monday.

Contributing: Erin Jensen

Related: Demi Lovato breaks silence on Instagram after leaving hospital; reportedly checks into rehab

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

 

 

Read or Share this story: https://ift.tt/2QAbY2f

Read More

from Viral Eyes https://ift.tt/2zRTkgs
via IFTTT

Anti-Kavanaugh activists are turning up the heat on Sen. Susan Collins in the final days of the confirmation battle

news image

Democratic activists have zeroed in on Sen. Susan Collins, the moderate Maine Republican, in their battle to defeat Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, which has reached a fever pitch as lawmakers close in on a final confirmation vote as early as Saturday.

A coalition of activists from Collins’s home state have joined together with activist Ady Barkan on the political crowdfunding platform Crowdpac to lead a grassroots fundraising campaign that will support Collins’s 2020 opponent if the senator votes to confirm Kavanaugh.

The unusual conditional fundraising effort has been quite successful so far — raising over $1.8 million of its $2 million goal from 64,000 donors as of Thursday. If Collins decides not to support Kavanaugh, donors will keep their money.

“Senator Collins votes NO on Kavanaugh and you will not be charged, and no money will go to fund her future opponent,” the campaign platform reads. “Senator Collins votes YES on Kavanaugh and your pledge will go to her opponent’s campaign, once that opponent has been identified.”

One recent donor wrote on the page, “This vote will define her legacy. I hope she can live with that.”

One of the few remaining centrist lawmakers in the GOP, Collins has stayed largely mum on the controversial nominee, who has been accused by three women of sexual misconduct — charges he categorically denies. Even before Kavanaugh’s accusers came forward last month, Collins’s vote was in question after she announced that she would not vote for the judge if he expressed any “hostility” toward Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision that established a constitutional right to abortion.

Protesters sit and chant against Judge Brett Kavanaugh as Capitol Hill Police officers make arrests outside the office of Sen. Susan Collins.
Alex Brandon/AP

‘Anybody who thinks these tactics would work on Senator Collins obviously doesn’t know her’

Liz Jaff, president of the Be A Hero PAC, which has teamed up with Maine groups, said the effort has focused most intensely on Collins because the two other moveable GOP senators — Jeff Flake of Utah and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska — appear more set on their votes, for and against Kavanaugh, respectively. The group also launched a more symbolic “rage campaign” against Sen. Chuck Grassley, 70% of the donors to which have been women.

While some ethics experts say this novel form of fundraising could violate federal bribery laws, others say that while the practice is unusual and possibly distasteful, it can’t be considered bribery because it doesn’t involve giving anything to Collins in exchange for her “no” vote.

Collins condemned the effort this week, describing it as an attempt to bribe or “bully” her.

“Anybody who thinks these tactics would work on Senator Collins obviously doesn’t know her,” Annie Clark, the senator’s spokeswoman, said in a statement. “Senator Collins will make up her mind based on the merits of the nomination. Threats or other attempts to bully her will not play a factor in her decision making whatsoever.”

Marie Follayttar, the co-director of Mainers for Accountable Leadership, said it’s cynical for Collins to criticize a grassroots campaign when she takes millions of dollars in donations from corporations.

“It’s politics at its worst,” Follayttar told Business Insider. “I think it’s going to be more actions and mobilization tactics like this that will take back the country and build it as a representative democracy that truly works for the people and not for corporate donors.”

Sen. Susan Collins meets with Judge Brett Kavanaugh in August.
Zach Gibson/Getty Images

Activists think their strategy is working

But activists say Collins’s pushback is a sign that their strategy has already been effective.

“The reason we know it’s working is she really hates us,” Jaff told Business Insider. “She keeps commenting on it and she keeps getting upset about it.”

The campaign is something of a win-win for Democrats. Even if they’re not successful in convincing Collins to vote against Kavanaugh, they will have gathered nearly $2 million and a 60,000-person email list for her 2020 challenger — significant firepower in a state as small as Maine. Jaff added that “countless groups” are ready to flood the state “the day after” a “yes” vote to begin voter registration and an effort to unseat the senator.

On Wednesday, Collins condemned President Donald Trump’s mockery of Christine Blasey Ford, one of the three women who has accused Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct, at a rally in Mississippi on Tuesday night, calling the president’s comments “just plain wrong.”

But on Thursday, after reading part of the FBI report on its investigation into the misconduct allegations against Kavanaugh, the senator suggested that she was content with the thoroughness of the probe, which Democrats have roundly decried as being overly limited by the White House.

“It appears to be a very thorough investigation, but I am going back later today to personally read the interviews,” Collins said. “That’s really all I have to say right now.”

Read More

from Viral Eyes https://ift.tt/2QvNM0N
via IFTTT

Halsey’s ‘Without Me’ Is Her Most Personal Song To Date: ‘I Cried The Whole Time’

news image

Halsey is back with her first new song not as Halsey. Technically, “Without Me,” is still released under that moniker, but — as she explained in an interview with Zane Lowe on Thursday (October 4) — it’s the first time she’s written a song using her real name, Ashley Frangipane.

“It’s just me. No wig, no colorful hair, no character, and it’s about my life and about my relationship that the world has watched so closely and so vehemently in the past year and a half,” Halsey explained, emphasizing that “Without Me” is a standalone track that’s not part of some grand Shakespearean concept album á la last year’s Hopeless Fountain Kingdom.

The relationship in question is Halsey’s romance with G-Eazy, which has been plagued by his rumored cheating and their brief split over the summer. The couple has since gotten back together, but “Without Me” seems to reflect on their torturous time apart. “Tell me how’s it feel sittin’ up there / Feeling so high but too far away to hold me,” she sings. “You know I’m the one who put you up there / Name in the sky / Does it ever get lonely? / Thinking you could live without me.”

For dramatic effect, the song even nods to Justin Timberlake’s spiteful 2002 breakup hit “Cry Me a River” with the lyrics, “You don’t have to say just what you did / I already know / I had to go and find out from them.”

Recording the track, Halsey admitted, was an emotional process. “I cried the whole time I recorded it,” she tweeted. “But now I feel proud. And empowered.”

See Halsey further discuss “Without Me” in the Beats 1 interview below.

Read More

from Viral Eyes https://ift.tt/2zStwB0
via IFTTT

Amy Schumer and Emily Ratajkowski detained while protesting Brett Kavanaugh

news image

New video shows Amy Schumer telling a police officer she wants to be arrested while protesting Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation in Washington, D.C.

The 37-year-old comedian was detained, reports MSBNC, as she was led by a police officer toward a large group of protestors that were also being held while at the Hart Senate Office Building on Thursday.

“You want to be arrested?” a police officer asked her and another female as he pointed toward the larger group that was chanting with police officers surrounding them.

“Yes,” Schumer said while wearing a green button-down shirt that read “This Today then #ERA.”

A producer for CNN noted on Twitter that model Emily Ratajkowski was alongside Schumer during the protests as well.

“Amy Schumer and Emily Ratajkowski in the senate office building for #Kavanaugh protests,” Joel Williams wrote.

Ratajkowski tweeted shortly after, saying she was “arrested” for protesting. “Men who hurt women can no longer be placed in positions of power,” she tweeted.

Schumer also carried a sign that read, “We Believe Anita Hill.”

A spokesperson for the United States Capitol Police did not immediately respond to PEOPLE’s request for comment.

In a Twitter video shared by Young People For, Schumer could be seen giving a speech to those gathered.

“Let’s stay together, let’s fight. Let’s keep showing up!” she said to people cheering.

Several protestors were present at the Hart Senate Office Building. The Women’s March Twitter accounted shared video of the protestors who attended with signs and chants.

“We were planning to shut down the Capitol Building but the authorities were so scared of this #WomensWave that they shut it down for us. 1000+ women, survivors, and allies have gathered in the Hart Senate Building. Every hallway. Every floor. #CancelKanavaugh #BelieveSurvivors,” the Twitter account wrote.

The protests come as senators are preparing to submit their votes on Kavanaugh’s confirmation to Supreme Court justice, following hearings questioning him after allegations of sexual assault came to light.

California professor Christine Blasey Ford, accused Kavanaugh of assaulting her a high school party about 36 years ago, which he has denied.

An initial vote of the Senate is scheduled for Friday, and a final vote will come over the weekend, according to USA Today.

Related content:

Read More

from Viral Eyes https://ift.tt/2QwrRGz
via IFTTT

Brazil elections 2018: What you need to know

news image

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil – About 147 million Brazilians will head to polls on Sunday in highly polarised presidential and congressional elections. 

At stake, is the presidency and more than 1,650 national and state level positions.

The vote takes place against a backdrop of widespread dissatisfaction prompted by a stuttering economy, worsening violent crime rates and several recent high-profile corruption scandals.

Here’s what you need to know about Sunday’s election:

Why does the vote matter?

Brazil, Latin America’s most populous country and largest economy, is a regional powerhouse.

Home to about 210 million people, Brazil forms part of the five-member “BRICS” group of major emerging economies alongside Russia, India, China and South Africa.

But several recent domestic setbacks have begun to erode the country’s standing on the world stage, according to Oliver Stuenkel, a professor of international relations at the Getulio Vargas Foundation (FGV).

Brazil at this point, and over the last few years, has lost its voice on international issues,” Stuenkel said.

“It is no longer able to project itself as a model … its legitimacy is lower today than four years ago [at the last election],” he added.

This year’s vote arrives at a critical juncture for Brazil’s future prospects as it battles to confront several complex and threatening challenges that have increased unrest and widened polarisation among the country’s citizens. 

What are the key issues?

At the top of voters minds are Brazil’s economic, political and social crises.

From 2000-2012 Brazil seized on a global commodities boom to become one of the fastest growing major economies in the world. A more than two-year long deep recession, which began in mid-2014, has since rocked the country and stagnated growth.

Though technically out of the recession since last year, the economy is still struggling to recover and unemployment stands at above 12 percent, according to the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics.

The fiscal downturn has coincided with numerous high-level corruption scandals since 2014 as part of the Lava Jato, or Car Wash, anti-graft probe and other interlocking investigations.

Widely popular former president Luiz Inacio ‘Lula’ da Silva was among more than 150 Brazilian business leaders, corporations and politicians convicted on the back of the investigations. He is now serving 12 years in jail and was barred from running in this election. Lula has consistently denied the charges, say they are  politically motivated.

The scandals involving the former president and others have decimated public faith in the country’s political class and democratic institutions.

Just 17 percent of Brazilians have confidence in the national government, according to US-based consultancy Gallup, down from 51 percent a decade ago.

Violent crime, meanwhile, has surged in the last few years. In 2017, a record 63,880 homicides took place in Brazil, up 2.9 percent from 2016.

In the grip of a worsening public security crisis, Brazil is now home to seven of the world’s 20 most violent cities.

The combination of these factors has placed Brazil “on the front lines of the global recession in democracies”, Brian Winter, vice president of policy at the Americas Society and Council of the Americas and editor-in-chief of Americas Quarterly, told Al Jazeera.

The issues present in Brazil are seen in a lot of places; disenchantment with the establishment, problems generating new employment, existential doubts over trade and rising violence,” Winter said.

“But in many of those cases they are just worse in Brazil than they have been in a lot of other places,” he added.

Who is being elected?

Voters will decide on the country 38th president and all 27 of Brazil’s state governorships.

Also up for grabs are most of the seats in Congress – including two-thirds of the 81-member upper-house Senate and all 513 places in the lower-house Chamber of Deputies – and 1,059 positions within state legislatures.

Who are the top presidential contenders?

Far-right frontrunner and controversial firebrand Jair Bolsonaro of the Social Liberal Party has led opinion polls in the run-up to the vote, and is projected to win up to 32 percent of the vote, according to Datafolha polling institute.

A Rio de Janeiro congressman since 1991, Bolsonaro has styled himself as a political outsider untarnished by corruption and pledged to end Brazil’s security problems by militarising the police and loosening gun laws.

His numerous discriminatory comments on race, gender and sexual orientation and several highly controversial remarks about the country’s former military dictatorship – in power from 1964-85 – have angered and alarmed tens of millions of Brazilians.

On Saturday, hundreds of thousands of Brazilians turned out in cities nationwide to protest his candidacy as part of a women-led #EleNao (#NotHim) movement. The next day, thousands of Bolsonaro’s supporters rallied throughout Brazil in response.

Last month, Bolsonaro was stabbed while out canvassing support in the city of Juiz de Fora, in southeastern Minais Gerais state, and has been unable to return to the campaign trail since.

People holding national flags gather in front of the condominium where leading presidential candidate Jair Bolsonaro resides to show their support, in Rio de Janeiro [Leo Correa/AP Photo]

Fernando Haddad, Bolsonaro’s closest opponent and the leftist Workers’ Party (PT) replacement candidate for Lula, is trailing the former army captain in second place with about 21 percent of support. 

Haddad, a former mayor of Sao Paulo and minister of education under Lula, has promised to “make Brazil happy again” and restore the economy to its former state of health under Lula’s presidency from 2003-2010.

He is facing the difficult balancing act of translating Lula’s widespread popularity among Brazil’s working class into votes for himself while also appealing to parts of the electorate with whom the former president and the wider PT are deeply unpopular.

Hostility towards the PT among some is high as a result of corruption scandals and the economic downturn which coincided with Dilma Rousseff’s, Lula’s successor, time in office from 2011 until her impeachment and removal from the presidency in August 2016.

Neither Bolsonaro or Haddad appear likely to secure the absolute majority of support required to win office in the first round vote, on October 7, and are widely tipped to contest a second round head-to-head vote on October 28 instead.

Polling suggests Ciro Gomes, Geraldo Alckmin and Marina Silva – a trio of centrists who have all run for the presidency at least once before – will not catch up with the two frontrunners.

In terms of the final two candidates it has actually been quite predictable,” Winter said.

Where it does become unpredictable is in this runoff, if it does confirm that we are looking at Bolsonaro versus Haddad then that’s about as close to a toss up as you get,” he added.

 

Haddad and Bolsonaro both have high rejection rates, however, hovering above 40 percent.

That could pose problems for Brazil post-election if, as appears likely to be the case, either of the pair are elected to the country’s highest office, according to Winter.

“If it’s one of these two candidates [Haddad or Bolsonaro] as president, I think they are going to face extremely difficult challenges on the economic and social front and possible questions about legitimacy,” Winter said.

“I think Brazil could come out of the election with a very divided society that may not be focused on the right things, and maybe focused more on division and this war between competing cults of personality than the very real economic, social and security challenges,” he added.

How does voting work?

More than 147 million people are eligible to vote. Participation is compulsory for “literate” Brazilians aged 18-70.

Participants will make their choices via an electronic voting system, using a single, number-based method. First, they will vote on state legislators, then congressional positions, state governors and, finally, the presidency.

The presidency, state governors and senators are decided on by a majority voting system.

Seats in the Chamber of Deputies and state legislatures, meanwhile, are determined using a proportional system.

Although most results will be decided on October 7, there may be a series of second round runoff ballots held on October 28.

Presidential and state governor candidates, unlike senators, require an absolute majority vote to be elected.

If no such result is returned on October 7, the best two performers from the first round go head-to-head in a second poll two weeks later.

At every level of government, those elected face a huge challenge to overturn the current malaise weighing on Brazil, according to Stuenkel.

“The broad sense of crises is clearly present, there is a notion that things are difficult … there is a sense of crises and that there is a complexity to the crises,” he said.

“Brazil is in a very difficult situation.”

Read More

from Viral Eyes https://ift.tt/2zSuc9w
via IFTTT

Retired Justice John Paul Stevens says Brett Kavanaugh shouldn’t be confirmed

news image

Share This Story!

Let friends in your social network know what you are reading about

Retired Justice John Paul Stevens says Brett Kavanaugh shouldn’t be confirmed

Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens is quoted as saying that Brett Kavanaugh shouldn’t be confirmed to the high court.

Loading…Post to Facebook

Posted!

A link has been posted to your Facebook feed.

CLOSE

The White House is defending the FBI supplemental report on Brett Kavanagh that is now being read by senators in advance of a vote on the judge’s confirmation, as Democrats complain the probe was not thorough. (Oct. 4)
AP

Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens is quoted as saying that Brett Kavanaugh shouldn’t be confirmed to the high court because of Kavanaugh’s potential political bias.

It’s rare for a retired justice to weigh in on a pending nomination.

The Palm Beach Post reports that Stevens, in remarks to a group of retirees in Florida, suggested Kavanaugh lacked the temperament for the lifetime appointment.

Stevens, who’s praised Kavanaugh before, says he’s changed his mind about Kavanaugh for reasons unrelated to Kavanaugh’s “intellectual ability.”

MoreKavanaugh and the FBI report: Here’s what we know now

MoreKavanaugh protesters put swing vote lawmakers on notice

Stevens is quoted as saying, “I feel his performance in the hearings ultimately changed my mind.”

He says commentators have argued that Kavanaugh’s Senate testimony last week showed a potential for political bias.

And the newspaper says Stevens says he thinks “there’s merit to that criticism and I think the senators should really pay attention that.”

The 98-year-old Stevens was nominated to the court by Republican President Gerald Ford and served from 1975 to 2010.

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

 

Read or Share this story: https://ift.tt/2RrjH3J

Read More

from Viral Eyes https://ift.tt/2Qv94eP
via IFTTT

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started